Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peta Kelly's avatar

That last paragraph-- exactly. I wrote similar in an entry this week celebrating international

Women’s day, because I can’t find a menstruating or pregnancy app that uses the word ‘woman’ or ‘mother’ in the day-to-day language with users. Only pregnant person, person with vulva, and parent. The total removal of ‘woman’ and ‘mother’ is not harmless and inclusive-- it’s dark and dangerous. Thank you for your writing, your perspective and your conviction. Peta

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Progz are terrified of the potential domino effect that might result from condemning even one eminently condemnable thing. Whatever rationale is used to censure that thing could easily--and, in fact, quite obviously--be used against the whole host of progressive sexual mores. Transgenderism? Infanticide? Gay marriage? Indeed, homosexuality itself? And, worst of all, it would invite prior restraint on their ultimate profligate endgame: unfettered and unlimited sex with kids. That's their goal and it always has been.

So, no, in their minds there can be no retreat. Everything must be tolerated save for intolerance itself. To do otherwise would imperil the entire mission.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts