Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Luke's avatar

I agree with your description of the scope, cultural saturation, and overall horror of the "transgender" movement. (It's important to use quotes, because it's not a real thing; the first step to defeating this scourge is to undermine it linguistically.)

But I'm not sure why the "backlash" would be particularly severe, or even happen at all. Three years ago, our local, state and Federal governments worked in concert to literally imprison their citizens under house arrest, shutter and destroy their businesses, nuke their children's education (even those not in government schools), force them into a humiliating and deleterious face masking regimen, and weaponize both public and private entities to relentlessly coerce them into injecting an untested, novel pharmaceutical cocktail into their bodies. All for a virus that was overwhelmingly survivable by all except a comically narrow subset of the population.

Since then, most of the people who did that (or advocated for it) have been reelected, or kept their jobs atop public health, or remained superintendents, or employed on cable news...whatever. I see no backlash outside of, as you said, "a few conservative writers and activists." I think many people realize what they did, and are deeply embarrassed by much of it--which is why there is a noticeable urge to memory hole the entire era. But backlash? Where?

I have an equally grim outlook for the era of sexually destroying children. The best we can hope for is that it eventually becomes passe, loses its cultural primacy, and sees many of its fiercest proponents attempt to distance themselves from it historically. Like a 90's kid pretending he never wore JNCOs. But I won't hold my breath for more.

Expand full comment

No posts